Hotline2 405 505

News

Friday, 10 October, 2025
Share

Statement of the Ministry of Justice of Georgia

The Ministry of Justice of Georgia responds to the information released by the State Security Service regarding the detention of Giorgi Kemoklidze, former Deputy Director of the Penitentiary Department of the Special Penitentiary Service.

The General Inspectorate of the Ministry of Justice had been conducting an internal investigation into the incident that occurred on July 11 of this year at Penitentiary Institution No. 8, involving K. Metreveli and G. Bachiashvili. At a certain stage of the investigation, in accordance with the law, the criminal case was transferred to the Anti-Corruption Agency of the State Security Service for further investigation.

The information made public yesterday by the Anti-Corruption Agency aligns with the version presented in the statement issued by the Special Penitentiary Service on August 21, 2025, regarding the incident that took place in the cell of G. Bachiashvili.

As part of the ongoing investigation, one of the former senior officials of the Special Penitentiary Service has been identified as having allegedly committed criminal acts. Such conduct harms the reputation of the Service and the hundreds of dedicated employees who perform their duties with integrity and responsibility on a 24-hour basis.

The Ministry of Justice and the Special Penitentiary Service continue to actively cooperate with the investigative authorities.

Other News

Share
Print

The Grand Chamber of the Strasbourg Court Delivers a Judgement on the Cases of the June 20-21, 2019 Demonstrations

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in the case Tsaava and Others v. Georgia at a public hearing today, 11 December 2025. The case concerns the demonstrations of 20–21 June 2019 and the use of special means to disperse the protesters.

In its judgment, the Grand Chamber reaffirmed that the state has the legitimate right to resort to special means in situations involving attacks or assaults on law enforcement officers and state institutions. The Court also noted that the escalation of the June 20 events and the assault on the Parliament building were encouraged by opposition politicians.

The Court held that the use of force and special means should have been directed exclusively at demonstrators who engaged in violent actions. As the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs at the time failed to ensure adherence to this standard and did not guarantee the proportional use of force, the Court found a violation of Articles 3 (prohibition of ill-treatment), 10 (freedom of expression), and 11 (freedom of assembly) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Grand Chamber further noted that the Government of Georgia fully cooperated with the Court during the proceedings and provided all necessary information and materials. Consequently, the applicants’ complaint alleging a lack of cooperation was dismissed. The Court did not find it necessary to examine the complaint under Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).

Following the shortcomings identified in the Chamber’s judgment of 7 May 2024, the government initiated an investigation into the planning and execution of the MIA operation to determine its compliance with the standards established by the European Court.

As a result of this investigation, on 12 November 2025, the Prosecutor’s Office of Georgia initiated criminal proceedings against the former Minister of Internal Affairs, Giorgi Gakharia. The investigation is ongoing.