Hotline2 405 505

News

Wednesday, 18 February, 2026
Share

According to the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, no Cases of Ill-treatment Were Recorded in Georgian Prisons

On 18 February 2026, the follow-up report on the visit of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), operating under the Council of Europe, was published.

The CPT positively assessed the level of cooperation received during the visit, noting that the delegation was provided with full support by both the leadership of the Ministry of Justice and the Penitentiary Service, as well as by the staff of the penitentiary institutions. The Committee emphasized that the delegation was able to visit all relevant facilities without hindrance, access the requested documentation, and conduct private interviews with prisoners. This, once again, confirms the transparency of the Georgian penitentiary system.

According to the report, the delegation did not receive any allegations or information regarding physical violence or ill-treatment of prisoners by staff. On the contrary, the CPT noted the existence of generally positive and calm relations between prison staff and inmates.

The Committee also positively assessed the conditions in the new penitentiary facility opened in Laituri township. The modern facility, designed to accommodate 700 inmates, is fully adapted to meet the needs of both remand and sentenced prisoners, as well as the institution’s staff. The CPT was further informed that a new small-scale penitentiary facility with a capacity of 150 inmates will be opened in the near future.

The health care system within the penitentiary service was likewise positively evaluated. The report notes that remand and sentenced prisoners are provided with 24-hour medical care, and that all institutions ensure prompt access to first aid services.

With regard to the recommendations contained in the report, the CPT emphasized the importance of increasing out-of-cell activities and expanding resocialization and rehabilitation programs, strengthening mechanisms for preventing and responding to inter-prisoner violence, and further improving the working conditions of penitentiary staff. Detailed information on both implemented and planned measures in response to these recommendations has been submitted to the Committee and is publicly available alongside the CPT report.

In addition to the CPT’s conclusions, statistics of the European Court of Human Rights serve as a further indicator of the effectiveness of reforms in the Georgian penitentiary system and the high standard of protection of prisoners’ rights. According to these statistics, since 2012, no case originating from the Georgian penitentiary system and submitted to the Strasbourg Court has been declared admissible.

The CPT delegation visited Georgia from 18 to 29 November 2024 and from 21 to 22 January 2025.

Other News

Share
Print
Share
Print

According to the Strasbourg Court, Publicly Made Insulting, Obscene, and Degrading Statements Fall Outside the Scope of Freedom of Expression

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg upheld the position of the Ministry of Justice in the case of Miladze v. Georgia, confirming that publicly made insulting, obscene, and degrading statements directed at public officials are not protected under the right to freedom of expression.

The case concerned a video published on the social media platform TikTok in 2022, in which the applicant, civil activist Irakli Miladze, used obscene and insulting language toward the Mayor of Tbilisi, City Hall employees, and police officers. As a result, the national courts imposed a fine of 500 GEL, the minimum penalty provided for by law.

The Strasbourg Court unanimously held that the applicant’s statements did not amount to political criticism or the expression of views on a matter of public interest. According to the Court’s assessment, the language used was intended primarily to humiliate and insult public officials.

The Court also agreed with the reasoning of the national courts, noting that they had properly distinguished between harsh political criticism, which is protected in a democratic society, and personal insults, which are not. The judgment further emphasized that the sanction imposed on the applicant was minimal and proportionate, as he received only the lowest fine available under the law.

Today’s ruling by the Strasbourg Court reaffirmed an important principle: freedom of expression is one of the fundamental values of a democratic society and protects even strong and offensive criticism; however, it does not extend to humiliating or personally insulting statements directed at others, including public officials and civil servants.

The judgment further underscores that the state is entitled to protect political officials and public servants from unjustified verbal abuse and insults, ensuring that they are able to perform their duties in an environment free from attacks that undermine their dignity.

The Court’s assessment once again highlights the fundamental importance of freedom of expression, while clearly establishing that the exercise of this right — particularly on the internet and social media platforms — must not infringe upon the dignity and rights of others.