Hotline2 405 505

News

Wednesday, 11 May, 2022
Share

Statement of the Ministry of Justice

Convict Mikheil Saakashvili, does not fully receive the prescribed treatment by his personal decision. In order to minimize the possible risks of deteriorating health resulting from his behavior, the Special Penitentiary Service offered him to be transferred to a multi-profile civil clinic for relevant medical treatment due to the high responsibility the state has for human health and life. The implementation of medical measures requires the informed consent of the person, instead of which the public has seen conditional consent equivalent to an ultimatum.

The Ministry of Justice and its Special Penitentiary Service express full confidence in the medical institutions licensed in Georgia and the medical staff working there, which always protects human health and life.

Expressing unfounded distrust of doctors and trying to interfere in their activities without any consent, delays and hinders the implementation of medical measures necessary for health.

We once again call on convicted Mikheil Saakashvili to use the health services offered to him without reservations in his own interests.

Penitentiary staff, in addition to health care, conduct a variety of activities 24 hours a day to ensure the safety of the inmate. Any decision will be made on the basis of a reasonable balance between these two benefits.

Admission of visitors will be ensured in accordance with the legislation and the recommendations of the medical staff.

We call on politically agitated individuals to refrain from any provocative actions that would prevent Mikheil Saakashvili from making a reasonable decision.

Other News

Share
Print

The Grand Chamber of the Strasbourg Court Delivers a Judgement on the Cases of the June 20-21, 2019 Demonstrations

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in the case Tsaava and Others v. Georgia at a public hearing today, 11 December 2025. The case concerns the demonstrations of 20–21 June 2019 and the use of special means to disperse the protesters.

In its judgment, the Grand Chamber reaffirmed that the state has the legitimate right to resort to special means in situations involving attacks or assaults on law enforcement officers and state institutions. The Court also noted that the escalation of the June 20 events and the assault on the Parliament building were encouraged by opposition politicians.

The Court held that the use of force and special means should have been directed exclusively at demonstrators who engaged in violent actions. As the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs at the time failed to ensure adherence to this standard and did not guarantee the proportional use of force, the Court found a violation of Articles 3 (prohibition of ill-treatment), 10 (freedom of expression), and 11 (freedom of assembly) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Grand Chamber further noted that the Government of Georgia fully cooperated with the Court during the proceedings and provided all necessary information and materials. Consequently, the applicants’ complaint alleging a lack of cooperation was dismissed. The Court did not find it necessary to examine the complaint under Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).

Following the shortcomings identified in the Chamber’s judgment of 7 May 2024, the government initiated an investigation into the planning and execution of the MIA operation to determine its compliance with the standards established by the European Court.

As a result of this investigation, on 12 November 2025, the Prosecutor’s Office of Georgia initiated criminal proceedings against the former Minister of Internal Affairs, Giorgi Gakharia. The investigation is ongoing.