Hotline2 405 505

News

Wednesday, 11 June, 2025
Share

Minister of Justice of Georgia Paata Salia Meets with Hungarian Counterpart Bence Tuzson

As part of the second Hungary–Georgia Intergovernmental Summit held in Budapest, the Minister of Justice of Georgia, Paata Salia, met with his Hungarian counterpart, Bence Tuzson.

The meeting focused on strengthening bilateral cooperation between the justice ministries of the two countries, particularly in areas such as digital governance and the exchange of best practices. Both sides emphasized the importance of sharing experiences to enhance the resilience and effectiveness of their legal systems in addressing contemporary challenges.

At the conclusion of the meeting, Minister Salia extended an official invitation to Minister Tuzson to participate in the World Forum on Public Services, which will be hosted in Tbilisi next year in collaboration with the United Nations.

Other News

Share
Print

Strasbourg Court Declares Complaints on Independence and Impartiality of Supreme Court Judges of Georgia Inadmissible

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the legal position presented by Georgia’s Ministry of Justice and, based on the submitted evidence, declared the complaints in Pirtskhalava and Y v. Georgia and Goginashvili v. Georgia inadmissible.

In these applications, the complainants alleged that one of the judges of the Supreme Court who examined their cases was biased. Additionally, the applicants in Pirtskhalava and Y claimed that Judge Sh.T. had not been appointed in accordance with the law.

The ECHR accepted the arguments of the Ministry of Justice and declared all three complaints regarding judicial impartiality inadmissible. In its decision, the Strasbourg Court reviewed the reforms undertaken by the Georgian authorities since 2012 to improve the justice system. In particular, it highlighted reforms such as: lifetime judicial appointments, improvements in the procedures for the appointment and promotion of judges, strengthening the role and functional independence of the High Council of Justice, and constitutional amendments that further refined the selection and appointment procedures for Supreme Court judges.

It is worth noting that the ongoing legal proceedings against Irakli Pirtskhalava concern the criminal case related to the murder of Buta Robakidze. Pirtskhalava additionally alleged that his criminal trial had been unfair, arguing that he had not been given the opportunity to question his former co-defendants and other witnesses or effectively challenge the evidence. The Strasbourg Court found no indication of a violation of his right to a fair trial and therefore declared his additional complaints inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.