Hotline2 405 505

News

Tuesday, 06 May, 2025
Share

In light of significant public interest, we are releasing a series of video materials related to the defendant, I.G. These materials confirm that no form of pressure or violence was exerted against the defendant

The full video archive is extensive—spanning approximately 220 hours from January 14 to January 23, 2025. Watch the video the here

We are currently publishing only the segments relevant to key circumstances. The full recordings were obtained in strict accordance with legal procedures and have also been made available to the deceased’s human rights representative.

Video N1 - January 21, 2025, 14:35-15:10, The defendant was escorted to the bathhouse and returned safely to his cell.

Video N2 - January 22, 2025 - 13:16, was taken from his cell to make a phone call;

13:25, Entered the medical room (no video surveillance inside);

13:32, Returned to his cell.

Video N3 - January 23, 2025 -

08:09, Food delivered to the cell;

09:24, Morning inspection conducted; one staff member entered briefly;

09:32, food delivered;

11:24, a prison guard placed a grocery bag at the cell door;

11:32, an employee delivered the bag (did not enter the cell), brief conversation through the door;

12:40, Social worker visited; spoke through the door;

13:51, Guard conversed with the defendant through the door;

14:03, food delivered;

14:25, Staff entered the cell urgently;

14:27, Medical personnel entered the cell;

14:51, I.G. was taken out on a stretcher to medical unit;

15:00, Ambulance arrived;

15:01, Paramedics entered the medical unit;

15:19, Paramedics exited the medical unit;

15:21, I.G. placed in ambulance;

15:24, Ambulance departed.

15:58, I.G. admitted to Vivamed Clinic.

The investigation is being conducted by the Eastern Division of the General Inspectorate under the Ministry of Justice.

The findings will be made public upon the conclusion of the investigation.

We once again express our deep sorrow over the passing of the defendant, I.G., and extend our heartfelt condolences to his family.

Other News

Share
Print

Strasbourg Court Declares Complaints on Independence and Impartiality of Supreme Court Judges of Georgia Inadmissible

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the legal position presented by Georgia’s Ministry of Justice and, based on the submitted evidence, declared the complaints in Pirtskhalava and Y v. Georgia and Goginashvili v. Georgia inadmissible.

In these applications, the complainants alleged that one of the judges of the Supreme Court who examined their cases was biased. Additionally, the applicants in Pirtskhalava and Y claimed that Judge Sh.T. had not been appointed in accordance with the law.

The ECHR accepted the arguments of the Ministry of Justice and declared all three complaints regarding judicial impartiality inadmissible. In its decision, the Strasbourg Court reviewed the reforms undertaken by the Georgian authorities since 2012 to improve the justice system. In particular, it highlighted reforms such as: lifetime judicial appointments, improvements in the procedures for the appointment and promotion of judges, strengthening the role and functional independence of the High Council of Justice, and constitutional amendments that further refined the selection and appointment procedures for Supreme Court judges.

It is worth noting that the ongoing legal proceedings against Irakli Pirtskhalava concern the criminal case related to the murder of Buta Robakidze. Pirtskhalava additionally alleged that his criminal trial had been unfair, arguing that he had not been given the opportunity to question his former co-defendants and other witnesses or effectively challenge the evidence. The Strasbourg Court found no indication of a violation of his right to a fair trial and therefore declared his additional complaints inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.