Hotline2 405 505

News

Thursday, 08 May, 2025
Share

Deputy Minister of Justice Presents Report to Georgian Parliament on Strasbourg Court Decisions

At a joint session of the Parliamentary Committees on Human Rights, Civil Integration, and Legal Affairs, Deputy Minister of Justice, Beka Dzamashvili presented reports on the implementation status of decisions issued against Georgia by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and various UN committees.

The report highlighted a significant decrease in the number of pending cases against Georgia before the Strasbourg Court. According to ECHR statistics, as of 2025, the number of such cases has dropped by 94% compared to 2011. Furthermore, since 2012, the Court has not admitted a single complaint originating from the Georgian penitentiary system.

This notable decline is attributed to the large-scale reforms carried out by the Georgian government in recent years, aimed at strengthening human rights protections and the justice system. As a result, Georgian citizens are now better equipped to defend their rights domestically. It was also noted that 85% of the 118 cases executed by the Strasbourg Court were implemented after 2013.

The Deputy Minister emphasized that all cases related to the 2008 war and the ongoing occupation were resolved in Georgia’s favor. The execution of these decisions against the Russian Federation is currently underway within the framework of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.

In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament of Georgia, the Ministry of Justice submits an annual report to Parliament detailing the execution of decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights and UN committees against the country.

Other News

Share
Print

Strasbourg Court Declares Complaints on Independence and Impartiality of Supreme Court Judges of Georgia Inadmissible

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the legal position presented by Georgia’s Ministry of Justice and, based on the submitted evidence, declared the complaints in Pirtskhalava and Y v. Georgia and Goginashvili v. Georgia inadmissible.

In these applications, the complainants alleged that one of the judges of the Supreme Court who examined their cases was biased. Additionally, the applicants in Pirtskhalava and Y claimed that Judge Sh.T. had not been appointed in accordance with the law.

The ECHR accepted the arguments of the Ministry of Justice and declared all three complaints regarding judicial impartiality inadmissible. In its decision, the Strasbourg Court reviewed the reforms undertaken by the Georgian authorities since 2012 to improve the justice system. In particular, it highlighted reforms such as: lifetime judicial appointments, improvements in the procedures for the appointment and promotion of judges, strengthening the role and functional independence of the High Council of Justice, and constitutional amendments that further refined the selection and appointment procedures for Supreme Court judges.

It is worth noting that the ongoing legal proceedings against Irakli Pirtskhalava concern the criminal case related to the murder of Buta Robakidze. Pirtskhalava additionally alleged that his criminal trial had been unfair, arguing that he had not been given the opportunity to question his former co-defendants and other witnesses or effectively challenge the evidence. The Strasbourg Court found no indication of a violation of his right to a fair trial and therefore declared his additional complaints inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.