Hotline2 405 505

News

Friday, 12 April, 2024
Share

Within the Framework of the 5th Armenian-Georgian Legal Forum, Rati Bregadze Meets with His Armenian Counterpart

During the 5th Armenian-Georgian Legal Forum, Rati Bregadze convened with his Armenian counterpart, Grigor Minasyan, to discuss pivotal aspects of their nations' strategic partnership and bolstering bilateral sectoral cooperation.

Emphasizing the imperative of legal stability within their established strategic alliance, Bregadze underscored the need to streamline legal frameworks between their countries, foreseeing beneficial ramifications for their respective economies.

"In nurturing a robust bond founded on mutual goodwill, we can fortify the legal underpinnings of our strategic ties, simplify inter-personal engagements, and drive economic growth," expressed Bregadze.

The dialogue encompassed attained milestones, ongoing institutional reforms, and forthcoming innovations within their respective Ministries of Justice. Additionally, to reinforce collaboration, the ministers explored novel initiatives aimed at enhancing national-level institutional efficacy and fostering regional communication and cooperation.

This year's Armenian-Georgian legal forum, is being held in Yerevan from April 11 to 12.

Other News

Share
Print

Strasbourg Court Declares Complaints on Independence and Impartiality of Supreme Court Judges of Georgia Inadmissible

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the legal position presented by Georgia’s Ministry of Justice and, based on the submitted evidence, declared the complaints in Pirtskhalava and Y v. Georgia and Goginashvili v. Georgia inadmissible.

In these applications, the complainants alleged that one of the judges of the Supreme Court who examined their cases was biased. Additionally, the applicants in Pirtskhalava and Y claimed that Judge Sh.T. had not been appointed in accordance with the law.

The ECHR accepted the arguments of the Ministry of Justice and declared all three complaints regarding judicial impartiality inadmissible. In its decision, the Strasbourg Court reviewed the reforms undertaken by the Georgian authorities since 2012 to improve the justice system. In particular, it highlighted reforms such as: lifetime judicial appointments, improvements in the procedures for the appointment and promotion of judges, strengthening the role and functional independence of the High Council of Justice, and constitutional amendments that further refined the selection and appointment procedures for Supreme Court judges.

It is worth noting that the ongoing legal proceedings against Irakli Pirtskhalava concern the criminal case related to the murder of Buta Robakidze. Pirtskhalava additionally alleged that his criminal trial had been unfair, arguing that he had not been given the opportunity to question his former co-defendants and other witnesses or effectively challenge the evidence. The Strasbourg Court found no indication of a violation of his right to a fair trial and therefore declared his additional complaints inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.