Hotline2 405 505

News

Saturday, 28 June, 2025
Share

The 64th round of Geneva International Discussions

The Georgian delegation to the Working Group on Humanitarian and Human Rights Issues was led by Deputy Minister of Justice, Beka Dzamashvili. The delegation also included representatives from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Office of the State Minister for Reconciliation and Civic Equality, as well as the heads of the Government of the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and the Temporary Administration of the former South Ossetian Autonomous Region.

The discussions focused on the continued and systematic violations of human rights in the occupied territories. It was emphasized that the European Court of Human Rights has already recognized the responsibility of the Russian Federation for the violations of fundamental rights and has confirmed the unconditional obligation to ensure the safe and dignified return of internally displaced persons to their homes. The Ministry of Justice actively leverages the outcomes of these international court rulings in the framework of the Geneva International Discussions.

The Geneva Discussions are facilitated by representatives of the European Union, the United Nations, and the OSCE.

The next round of talks is scheduled for November 11–12, 2025.

The Ministry of Justice, in close coordination with other state institutions, remains committed to the vigorous defense of Georgia’s interests before international courts and relevant international mechanisms.

Other News

Share
Print

Strasbourg Court Declares Complaints on Independence and Impartiality of Supreme Court Judges of Georgia Inadmissible

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the legal position presented by Georgia’s Ministry of Justice and, based on the submitted evidence, declared the complaints in Pirtskhalava and Y v. Georgia and Goginashvili v. Georgia inadmissible.

In these applications, the complainants alleged that one of the judges of the Supreme Court who examined their cases was biased. Additionally, the applicants in Pirtskhalava and Y claimed that Judge Sh.T. had not been appointed in accordance with the law.

The ECHR accepted the arguments of the Ministry of Justice and declared all three complaints regarding judicial impartiality inadmissible. In its decision, the Strasbourg Court reviewed the reforms undertaken by the Georgian authorities since 2012 to improve the justice system. In particular, it highlighted reforms such as: lifetime judicial appointments, improvements in the procedures for the appointment and promotion of judges, strengthening the role and functional independence of the High Council of Justice, and constitutional amendments that further refined the selection and appointment procedures for Supreme Court judges.

It is worth noting that the ongoing legal proceedings against Irakli Pirtskhalava concern the criminal case related to the murder of Buta Robakidze. Pirtskhalava additionally alleged that his criminal trial had been unfair, arguing that he had not been given the opportunity to question his former co-defendants and other witnesses or effectively challenge the evidence. The Strasbourg Court found no indication of a violation of his right to a fair trial and therefore declared his additional complaints inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.