Hotline2 405 505

News

Wednesday, 07 May, 2025
Share

Deputy Minister of Justice Explores Opportunities for Enhanced Cooperation with British Attorneys

Deputy Minister of Justice of Georgia, Beka Dzamashvili, met with a delegation of British attorneys to present the Ministry’s key activities and strategic priorities.

The discussion highlighted the protection of Georgia’s interests in international courts and arbitration forums, recent reforms in the justice sector, and advancements in the field of human rights. Emphasis was placed on the crucial role attorneys play as defenders of human rights within these ongoing reforms.

The parties also explored ways to popularize English law in Georgia and to develop joint initiatives aimed at increasing awareness and understanding of case law.

The British delegation is visiting Georgia as part of the “English Law Forum,” organized by the Georgian Bar Association.

Other News

Share
Print

Strasbourg Court Declares Complaints on Independence and Impartiality of Supreme Court Judges of Georgia Inadmissible

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the legal position presented by Georgia’s Ministry of Justice and, based on the submitted evidence, declared the complaints in Pirtskhalava and Y v. Georgia and Goginashvili v. Georgia inadmissible.

In these applications, the complainants alleged that one of the judges of the Supreme Court who examined their cases was biased. Additionally, the applicants in Pirtskhalava and Y claimed that Judge Sh.T. had not been appointed in accordance with the law.

The ECHR accepted the arguments of the Ministry of Justice and declared all three complaints regarding judicial impartiality inadmissible. In its decision, the Strasbourg Court reviewed the reforms undertaken by the Georgian authorities since 2012 to improve the justice system. In particular, it highlighted reforms such as: lifetime judicial appointments, improvements in the procedures for the appointment and promotion of judges, strengthening the role and functional independence of the High Council of Justice, and constitutional amendments that further refined the selection and appointment procedures for Supreme Court judges.

It is worth noting that the ongoing legal proceedings against Irakli Pirtskhalava concern the criminal case related to the murder of Buta Robakidze. Pirtskhalava additionally alleged that his criminal trial had been unfair, arguing that he had not been given the opportunity to question his former co-defendants and other witnesses or effectively challenge the evidence. The Strasbourg Court found no indication of a violation of his right to a fair trial and therefore declared his additional complaints inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.