Hotline2 405 505

News

Wednesday, 16 April, 2025
Share

Minister of Justice of Georgia, Paata Salia Meets with the Ambassador of Armenia to Georgia, Ashot Smbatyan

During the meeting, the parties discussed avenues for enhancing cooperation in the field of justice. They highlighted the significance of the Georgian-Armenian Legal Forum as a valuable platform for sharing best practices and fostering collaboration between legal professionals from both countries.

The discussion also focused on potential directions for future cooperation between the Ministries of Justice of Georgia and Armenia.

Minister Salia provided an overview of the key priorities and areas of activity of the Georgian Ministry of Justice. He also expressed his willingness to host his Armenian counterpart in Tbilisi in the near future. Deputy Minister of Justice, Beka Dzamashvili, also attended the meeting.

Other News

Share
Print

Strasbourg Court Declares Complaints on Independence and Impartiality of Supreme Court Judges of Georgia Inadmissible

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) upheld the legal position presented by Georgia’s Ministry of Justice and, based on the submitted evidence, declared the complaints in Pirtskhalava and Y v. Georgia and Goginashvili v. Georgia inadmissible.

In these applications, the complainants alleged that one of the judges of the Supreme Court who examined their cases was biased. Additionally, the applicants in Pirtskhalava and Y claimed that Judge Sh.T. had not been appointed in accordance with the law.

The ECHR accepted the arguments of the Ministry of Justice and declared all three complaints regarding judicial impartiality inadmissible. In its decision, the Strasbourg Court reviewed the reforms undertaken by the Georgian authorities since 2012 to improve the justice system. In particular, it highlighted reforms such as: lifetime judicial appointments, improvements in the procedures for the appointment and promotion of judges, strengthening the role and functional independence of the High Council of Justice, and constitutional amendments that further refined the selection and appointment procedures for Supreme Court judges.

It is worth noting that the ongoing legal proceedings against Irakli Pirtskhalava concern the criminal case related to the murder of Buta Robakidze. Pirtskhalava additionally alleged that his criminal trial had been unfair, arguing that he had not been given the opportunity to question his former co-defendants and other witnesses or effectively challenge the evidence. The Strasbourg Court found no indication of a violation of his right to a fair trial and therefore declared his additional complaints inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.